Authors: Ivana Juřičková, Karel Roubík, Martin Müller

Citation

Jurickova I, Roubik K, Muller M (2015) Delivery of heliox with a semi-closed circuit during spontaneous breathing: a comparative economic theoretical study. BMC Pulmonary Medicine 15:65. doi:10.1186/s12890-015-0060-9

Fulltext in PDF & fulltext download

Download PDF fulltext here.

Published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine.

Abstract

Background: Heliox is a mixture of oxygen and helium which reduces airway resistance in patients with airway obstruction. In clinical practice, patients breathing spontaneously receive heliox via an open circuit. Recently, a semi-closed circuit for heliox administration has been proposed which minimizes consumption of heliox and therefore cost of the heliox therapy; although, the semi-closed circuit is associated with additional costs. The aim of the study is to conduct an economical analysis comparing total cost of heliox therapy using an open versus a semi-closed circuit in spontaneously breathing patients with airway obstruction. Methods: Four different systems for heliox administration were analyzed: an open circuit and three alternatives of a semi-closed circuit involving a custom made semi-closed circuit and two standard anesthesia machines. Total costs of heliox therapy were calculated for all the systems. For calculation of gas consumption, the clinical procedures limiting continuous heliox therapy including the aerosol therapy, personal hygiene and nutrition were taken into account. A sensitivity analysis was conducted for main input variables that may influence the results of the study. Results: Price of gases consumed by a semi-closed system represents less than 20 % of price of gases when a standard open circuit is used. This represents a saving of approximately 540 EUR per patient. The initial cost of the custom-made semi-closed circuit recuperates after treatment of 18 patients. The corresponding number of patients is 32 when a low-cost anesthesia machine is initially acquired and rises to 69 when a highly advanced anesthesia machine is considered. Conclusions: Heliox therapy in spontaneously breathing patients using a semi-closed circuit becomes more cost-effective compared to the open circuit, currently used in clinical practice, when applied in a sufficient number of cases. The impact of finding a cheaper way of heliox administration on the clinical practice needs to be ascertained.

References:

  1. Tobin MJ. Principles and Practice of Mechanical Ventilation. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2012. p. 1472.
  2. Hess D. Heliox and noninvasive positive-pres sure ventilation: A role for heliox in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Respir Care. 2006;51:640–50.
  3. Frazier MD, Cheifetz IM. The role of heliox in paediatric respiratory disease. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2010;11:46–53.
  4. Eves ND, Ford GT. Helium–oxygen: A versatile therapy to “lighten the load” of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Respir Med COPD Updat. 2007;3:87–94.
  5. Roche-Campo F, Vignaux L, Galia F, Lyazidi A, Vargas F, Texereau J, et al. Delivery of helium–oxygen mixture during spontaneous breathing: evaluation of three high-concentration face masks. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:1787–92.
  6. Fleming M, Weigelt J, Brewer V, McIntire D. Effect of Helium and Oxygen on air-flow in a narrowed airway. Arch Surg. 1992;127:956–60.
  7. Roubik K, Zazula R, Strnadova A. Spontaneous breathing of heliox using a semi-closed circuit: A bench study. Int J Artif Organs. 2012;35:466–70.
  8. Urs PS, Khan F, Maiya PP. Bubble CPAP – A Primary Respiratory Support for Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Newborns. Indian Pediatr. 2009;46:409–11.
  9. Turnbull D, Fisher PC, Mills GH, Morgan-Hughes NJ. Performance of breathing filters under wet conditions: a laboratory evaluation. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94:675–82.
  10. Bullard MJ, Liaw SJ, Tsai YH, Min HP. Early corticosteroid use in acute exacerbations of chronic airflow obstruction. Am J Emerg Med. 1996;14:139–43.
  11. Kaul TK, Mittal G. Mapleson’s Breathing Systems. Indian J Anaesth. 2013;57:507–15.
  12. West JB: Best and Taylor’s Physiological Basis of Medical Practice. 12th edition. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1990:1170.
  13. Piquilloud L, Tassaux D, Bialais E, Lambermont B, Sottiaux T, Roeseler J, et al. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) improves patient-ventilator interaction during non-invasive ventilation delivered by face mask. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38:1624–31.
  14. Ballester E, Reyes A, Roca J, Guitart R, Wagner PD, Rodriguez-Roisin R. Ventilation-perfusion mismatching in acute severe asthma: effects of salbutamol and 100 % oxygen. Thorax. 1989;44:258–67.
  15. Boeck L, Tamm M, Grendelmeier P, Stolz D. Acute effects of aerosolized iloprost in COPD related pulmonary hypertension – a randomized controlled crossover trial. PLoS One. 2012;7:e52248.
  16. Chatmongkolchart S, Kacmarek RM, Hess DR. Heliox delivery with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation: a laboratory study. Respir Care. 2001;46:248–54.
  17. Gentile MA. Inhaled medical gases: more to breathe than oxygen. Respir Care. 2011;56:1341–59.
  18. Adee S. Physics Projects Deflate for Lack of Helium-3 [Update. IEEE Spectr. 2010;47:16–7.
  19. Gainnier M, Forel J-M. Clinical review: use of helium-oxygen in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2006;10:241.