Frequency and duration of extreme hypoxemic and hyperoxemic episodes during manual and automatic oxygen control in preterm infants: a retrospective cohort analysis from randomized studies

Authors: Thomas E. Bachman, Wes Onland, Anton H. van Kaam, Karel Roubik, Helmut D. Hummler, Mithilesh Lal, Gianluca Lista and Carlos A. Fajardo

Citation

Fulltext in PDF & fulltext download

Published in BMC Pediatrics

Download fulltext in PDF here: Frequency-and-duration-of-extreme-hypoxemic-and-hyperoxemic-episodes-during-manual-and-automatic-oxygen-control-in-preterm-infants–a-retrospective-cohort-analysis-from-randomized-studies.pdf

Abstract

Objective Neonatal exposure to episodic hypoxemia and hyperoxemia is highly relevant to outcomes. Our goal was to investigate the differences in the frequency and duration of extreme low and high SpO2 episodes between automated and manual inspired oxygen control. Design Post-hoc analysis of a cohort from prospective randomized cross-over studies. Setting Seven tertiary care neonatal intensive care units. Patients Fifty-eight very preterm neonates (32 or less weeks PMA) receiving respiratory support and supplemental oxygen participating in an automated versus manual oxygen control cross-over trial. Main measures Extreme hypoxemia was defined as a SpO2 < 80%, extreme hyperoxemia as a SpO2 > 98%. Episode duration was categorized as < 5 seconds, between 5 to < 30 seconds, 30 to < 60 seconds, 60 to < 120 seconds, and 120 seconds or longer. Results The infants were of a median postmenstrual age of 29 (28-31) weeks, receiving a median FiO2 of 0.28 (0.25-0.32) with mostly receiving non-invasive respiratory support (83%). While most of the episodes were less than 30 seconds, longer episodes had a marked effect on total time exposure to extremes. The time differences in each of the three longest durations episodes (30, 60, and 120 seconds) were significantly less during automated than during manual control (p < 0.001). Nearly two-third of the reduction of total time spent at the extremes between automated and manual control (3.8 to 2.1% for < 80% SpO2 and 3.0 to 1.6% for > 98% SpO2) was seen in the episodes of at least 60 seconds. Conclusions This study shows that the majority of episodes preterm infants spent in SpO2 extremes are of short duration regardless of manual or automated control. However, the infrequent longer episodes not only contribute the most to the total exposure, but also their reduction in frequency to the improvement associated with automated control.

References

1. Hagadorn JJ, Sink DW, Buus-Frank ME, et al. Alarm safety and oxygen saturation targets in the Vermont Oxford Network iNICQ 2015 collaborative. J Perinatol. 2017;37:270–6.
2. van Zanten HA, Tan RN, Thio M, et al. The risk for hyperoxaemia after apnoea, bradycardia and hypoxaemia in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014;99(4):F269–73.
3. Poets C, Roberts R, Schmidt B, et al. Association between intermittent hypoxemia or bradycardia and late death or disability in extremely preterm infants. JAMA. 2015;314(6):595–603.
4. Askie LM, Henderson-Smart DJ, Irwig L, Simpson JM. Oxygen-saturation targets and outcomes in extremely preterm infants. NEJM. 2003;349:959–67. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1056/ NEJMo a0230 80.
5. Mitra S, Singh B, El-Naggar W, McMillan DD. Automated versus manual control of inspired oxygen to target oxygen saturation in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Perinatol. 2018;38(4):351–60.
6. Abdo M, Hanbal A, Asla MM, et al. Automated versus manual oxygen control in preterm infants receiving respiratory support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021:1–8.
7. van Kaam AH, Hummler H, Wilinska M, et al. Automated versus manual oxygen control with different saturation targets and modes of respiratory support in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2015;167(3):545–50.
8. van den Heuvel ME, van Zanten HA, Bachman T, et al. Optimal target range of closed-loop inspired oxygen support in preterm infants: a randomized controlled study. J Pediatr. 2018;197:36–41.
9. Claure N, Bancalari E, D’Ugard C, et al. Multicenter crossover study of automated control of inspired oxygen in ventilated preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2011;127(1):e76–83.
10. Lal M, Tin W, Sinha S. Automated control of inspired oxygen in ventilated preterm infants: crossover physiological study. Acta Paediatr. 2015;104(11):1084–9.
11. Waitz M, Schmid MB, Fuchs H, et al. Effects of automated adjustment of the inspired oxygen on fluctuations of arterial and regional cerebral tissue oxygenation in preterm infants with frequent desaturations. J Pediatr. 2015;166(2):240–4.
12. Schmidt B, Whyte RK, Shah PS, et al. Effects of targeting higher or lower oxygen saturations in centers with more versus less separation between median saturations. J Pediatr. 2016;178:288–91.
13. Raffay TM, Dylag AM, Sattar A, et al. Neonatal intermittent hypoxemia events are associated with diagnosis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks postmenstrual age. Pediatr Res. 2019;85(3):318–23.
14. Di Fiore J, Bloom J, Orge F, et al. A higher incidence of intermittent hypoxemic episodes is associated with severe retinopathy of prematurity. J Pediatr. 2010;157(1):69–73.
15. Warakomska M, Bachman TE, Wilinska M. Evaluation of two SpO2 alarm strategies during automated FiO2 control in the NICU: a randomized crossover study. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19(1):142.
16. Bachman TE. Prevalence of potentially clinically relevant complex episodes of extreme SpO2 during manual and automatic control of inspired oxygen. Lek Tech. 2022;52(1):84–90.
17. Bachman TE, Newth CJL, Iyer NP, et al. Hypoxemic and hyperoxemic likelihood in pulse oximetry ranges: NICU observational study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019;104(3):F274–9.
18. Stenson BJ. Achieved oxygenation saturations and outcome in extremely preterm infants. Clin Perinatol. 2019;46(3):601–10.