Work of Breathing into Snow in the Presence versus Absence of an Artificial Air Pocket Affects Hypoxia and Hypercapnia of a Victim Covered with Avalanche Snow: A Randomized Double Blind Crossover Study

Authors: Karel Roubík, Ladislav Sieger, Karel Sýkora

Citation

Roubík K, Sieger L, Sykora K (2015) Work of Breathing into Snow in the Presence versus Absence of an Artificial Air Pocket Affects Hypoxia and Hypercapnia of a Victim Covered with Avalanche Snow: A Randomized Double Blind Crossover Study. PLoS ONE 10(12): e0144332. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144332

Fulltext in PDF & fulltext download

Download PDF fulltext here.

Published in PLoS One.

Abstract

Presence of an air pocket and its size play an important role in survival of victims buried in the avalanche snow. Even small air pockets facilitate breathing. We hypothesize that the size of the air pocket significantly affects the airflow resistance and work of breathing. The aims of the study are (1) to investigate the effect of the presence of an air pocket on gas exchange and work of breathing in subjects breathing into the simulated avalanche snow and (2) to test whether it is possible to breathe with no air pocket. The prospective interventional double-blinded study involved 12 male volunteers, from which 10 completed the whole protocol. Each volunteer underwent two phases of the experiment in a random order: phase “AP”—breathing into the snow with a one-liter air pocket, and phase “NP”—breathing into the snow with no air pocket. Physiological parameters, fractions of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the airways and work of breathing expressed as pressure-time product were recorded continuously. The main finding of the study is that it is possible to breath in the avalanche snow even with no air pocket (0 L volume), but breathing under this condition is associated with significantly increased work of breathing. The significant differences were initially observed for end-tidal values of the respiratory gases (EtO₂ and EtCO₂) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) between AP and NP phases, whereas significant differences in inspiratory fractions occurred much later (for F_IO₂) or never (for F_ICO₂). The limiting factor in no air pocket conditions is excessive increase in work of breathing that induces increase in metabolism accompanied by higher oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production. The presence of even a small air pocket reduces significantly the work of breathing.

References

1.
Falk M, Brugger H, Adler-Kastner L. Avalanche survival chances. Nature 1994; 368:21.
2.
Haegeli P, Falk M, Brugger H, Etter HJ, Boyd J. Comparison of avalanche survival patterns in Canada and Switzerland. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2011, 183(7), 789–795.
3.
Boyd J, Haegeli P, Abu-Laban RB, Shuster M, Butt JC. Patterns of death among avalanche fatalities: a 21-year review. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2009; 180:5: 507–512.
4.
McIntosh SE, Grisom CK, Olivares CR, Kim HS, Tremper B. Cause of death in avalanche fatalities. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 2007; 18:4: 293–297.
5.
Hohlrieder M, Brugger H, Schubert HM, Pavlic M, Ellerton J, Mair P. Pattern and severity of injury in avalanche victims. High Altitude Medicine & Biology 2007; 8:1: 56–61.
6.
Grissom CK, McAlpine JC, Harmston CH, Radwin MI, Giesbrecht GG, Sholand MB, et al. Hypercapnia Effect on Core Cooling and Shivering Treshold During Snow Burial. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 2008; 79:8: 735–742.
7.
Grissom CK, Radwin MI, Harmston CH, Hirshberg EL, Crowley TJ. Respiration during snow burial using an artificial air pocket. Jama 2000; 283:17: 2261–2271.
8.
Windsor JS, Hamilton E, Grocott MP, O ́Dwyer MJ, Milledge JS. The snow snorkel: A proof of concept study. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 2009; 20: 61–65.
9.
Radwin IM, Grisom CK, Scholand MB, Harmston CH. Normal Oxygenetation and Ventilation during Snow Burial by the Exclusion of Exhaled Carbon Dioxine. Wilderness Enviromental & Medicine 2001; 12: 256–262.
10.
Paal P, Strapazzon G, Braun P, Ellmauer PP, Schroeder DC, Suman G, et al. Factors affecting survival from avalanche burial–A randomised prospective porcine pilot study. Resuscitation 2013; 84:2: 239–243.
11.
Brugger H, Sumann G, Meister R, Adler-Kastner L, Mair P, Gunga HC. Hypoxia and hypercapnia during respiration into an artificial air pocket in the snow: implications for avalanche survival. Rescuscitation 2003; 58: 81–88.
12.
Brugger H, Durrer B, Adler-Kastner L, Falk M, Tschirky F. Field management of avalanche victims. Resuscitation 2001; 51: 7–15.
13.
Brugger H, Paal P, Boyd J. Prehospital resuscitation of the buried avalanche victim. High Altitude Medicine & Biology 2011; 12(3): 199–205.
14.
Otis AB. The Work of Breathing. J Physiological Reviews 1954; 34:3: 449–458.
15.
American Society of Anesthesiologists, INC. New Classification of Physical Status, Anesthesiology, 1963; 24: 111.
16.
Lumb AB. Nunn’s Applied Respiratory Physiology. 7th edition. Elsevier, 2012.
17.
EN ISO 8835–2. Inhalational anesthesia systems—Part 2: Anaesthetic breathing systems. Brussel: European Comitee for Standardization, 2009.
18.
McClung D, Schaerer PA. The Avalanche Handbook; Mountainers: Seattle, WA, 1993. Work of Breathing and Survival in Avalanche Snow
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0144332 December 14, 2015 15 / 16
19.
Bellani G, Patroniti N, Weismann D, Galbiati L, Curto F, Foti G, et al. Measurement of Pressure-Time Product during Spontaneous Assisted Breathing by Rapid Interrupter Technique. Anesthesiology 2007; 106: 484–90.
20.
Field S, Sanci S, Grassino A. Respiratory muscle oxygen consumption estimated by the diaphragm pressure-time index. J Appl Physiol 1984; 57: 44–51.
21.
Sassoon CS, Mahutte CK. Work of breathing during mechanical ventilation, Physiological Basis of Ventilatory Support. Edited by Marini JJ, Slutsky A. New York, Marcel Dekker, 1998. pp. 261–310.
22.
Collett PW, Perry C, Engel LA. Pressure-time product, flow and oxygen cost of resistive breathing in humans. J Appl Physiol 1985; 58: 1263–72.